![]()
There is a reason why I’m interested in waiting for alternatives to iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch is because I want the sort of freedom I get with a desktop computer. Please, all companies do what is in their own best interest first and foremost – if it happens to line up with consumer rights then it is mere coincidence rather than something designed to do right from the start. Regarding the iOS ecosystem – you think that Microsoft is different? just look at the fiasco that unfolded when WP7 was jailbroken just recently by some hardware hackers – and Microsofts response was that it opens the door to piracy. #SILVERLIGHT 5 BETA DEVELOPER RUNTIME FOR MAC FREE#If you don’t like iTunes there is nothing stopping you from purchasing music from Amazon or some other outlet that is DRM free either – so pray tell where is this ‘monopoly’ or ‘abuse of power’ that you referring to? #SILVERLIGHT 5 BETA DEVELOPER RUNTIME FOR MAC PLUS#What is anti-competitive about iTunes? You can purchase music from iTunes and put it on other devices – just purchase iTunes Plus music which is DRM free and you’re ready to go. #SILVERLIGHT 5 BETA DEVELOPER RUNTIME FOR MAC MAC OS X#In other words Windows and Mac OS X are in the exact same situation.Īs for the benefits of WebM, those benefits have become a lot slimmer now that h264 patent owners have come clean about who they’re going to charge and who they’ll allow to use the technology free of charge. Statistically speaking, if it was the case, Apple couldn’t have reached a near-absolute monopoly on the DAP/PMP market.Īpple have learned the lesson Microsoft gave them in the past : they have embraced Microsoft’s anti-competive tricks with iTunes, are currently extending them to a point where not even Microsoft dared to go with the iOS ecosystem, and we know how it ends in the future if nothing comes in their way…Īnd yet there is nothing stopping someone from creating a QuickTime plugin so that WebM support exists on Mac OS X in much the same way that if you want WebM on Windows – it is just a matter of creating a ‘Media Foundation’ plugin so that videos using WebM can load. Yes, I know all the cool kids these days are bashing Apple This gave Microsoft the wondrous opportunity to kick Mozilla in the butt without risking any lawsuit or bad publicity by being the only jerk to do so : all they had to do was to implement only H.264 as a default. No standard solution for the video tag was envisionable anymore. Only recently, after discovering that Firefox had reached 30% market share in some places of the word, did they realize that IE was doomed anyway if they did not took the time to take it out of the stone age and make the first good release of IE in a while : the upcoming IE9.īy the time they were ready to implement the video tag, Apple had already made it a failure. Proper web standards are bad for them, since they mean the end of IE, and therefore less power in the desktop computing world for them. Microsoft’s situation is a bit different.Īt the time, they did not pretended to support the video tag at all. ![]() #SILVERLIGHT 5 BETA DEVELOPER RUNTIME FOR MAC DOWNLOAD#Where is Microsoft stating they’ll provide a WebM CODEC out of the box or as a free download for their ‘Media Foundation’? So yes, Apple are the ones to blame here, before everyone else. And because they are quite big in the mobile space, we can’t just leave them behind. The only reason Apple has, as of today, to only support H.264, is greed. The “no hw accelerated decoding” argument was lame from the beginning, since anyone with some GLSL skills could have corrected this, but now there’s hardware WebM decoders in production anyway. Now, WebM/VP8 is pretty much on par with H.264, or even a bit better, for the average guy’s eye, so this doesn’t hold anymore. Well, they didn’t watch the average content of Youtube, but let’s admit that. ![]() ![]() Therefore, everything got stuck.Īt the time, people said that theora was not good enough for the web. Then they said that their browser would not support anything but H.264. Then Apple came and thought “oh no no no we have paid a lot for this silly codec and it pisses us off that everybody uploading a video does not owe us royalties”. This way, the video tag could be widely used, since people wouldn’t have to put two versions of each video on their website. Therefore, the optimal solution was obvious : include Theora, and then H.264 if you want. Everybody could include Ogg Theora, but not everybody could include H.264. As for ‘Apple bombed the codec situation’ – how did they do that?īrowser manufacturers had to include a codec in their web browser. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |